Comments on: HDTV: High-Deshou Television http://omonomono.com/2006/07/29/hd-television-high-deshou-television/ The Yard Sale Thu, 17 May 2012 13:48:54 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2 By: omo http://omonomono.com/2006/07/29/hd-television-high-deshou-television/#comment-47 omo Sun, 30 Jul 2006 02:51:38 +0000 http://omo.serenana.info/2006/07/29/hd-television-high-deshou-television/#comment-47 I understand that, and it is subjective. They did invent blurring filters and rendering for a reason, after all. I understand that, and it is subjective. They did invent blurring filters and rendering for a reason, after all.

]]> By: kacpy http://omonomono.com/2006/07/29/hd-television-high-deshou-television/#comment-46 kacpy Sat, 29 Jul 2006 22:13:02 +0000 http://omo.serenana.info/2006/07/29/hd-television-high-deshou-television/#comment-46 Ah... "when it's worth showing". I am an audio/video quality whore, and that response doesn't work for me. I do want quality all the time. :) Enjoy fakeHD. ;) Ah… “when it’s worth showing”. I am an audio/video quality whore, and that response doesn’t work for me. I do want quality all the time. :)

Enjoy fakeHD. ;)

]]> By: omo http://omonomono.com/2006/07/29/hd-television-high-deshou-television/#comment-45 omo Sat, 29 Jul 2006 21:31:36 +0000 http://omo.serenana.info/2006/07/29/hd-television-high-deshou-television/#comment-45 Upscaling is an art, too. Some upscaled anime are really a lot better looking than the source at a lower rez. But right, more detail, less artifacts and blurring are good.......when your details are worth showing. I'd say for 4 out of 5 anime out there, this is just not the case. Upscaling is an art, too. Some upscaled anime are really a lot better looking than the source at a lower rez. But right, more detail, less artifacts and blurring are good…….when your details are worth showing. I’d say for 4 out of 5 anime out there, this is just not the case.

]]> By: kacpy http://omonomono.com/2006/07/29/hd-television-high-deshou-television/#comment-44 kacpy Sat, 29 Jul 2006 20:47:07 +0000 http://omo.serenana.info/2006/07/29/hd-television-high-deshou-television/#comment-44 If it does AIR in that video rez then yea, I won't object it being called HD material, but if it's an upscale on the ENCODER's part then hell no. :) More detail, less artifacts and blurring does make a big difference, unless you really don't care about video quality *recalls his chevalier encodes post*. ;) If it does AIR in that video rez then yea, I won’t object it being called HD material, but if it’s an upscale on the ENCODER’s part then hell no. :)

More detail, less artifacts and blurring does make a big difference, unless you really don’t care about video quality *recalls his chevalier encodes post*. ;)

]]> By: omo http://omonomono.com/2006/07/29/hd-television-high-deshou-television/#comment-43 omo Sat, 29 Jul 2006 19:37:17 +0000 http://omo.serenana.info/2006/07/29/hd-television-high-deshou-television/#comment-43 Nothing I read about Haruhi\'s broadcast said HD, so I would presume it wasn\'t either. I think you have to say that EVERY single 1280x720+ raw is HD because that\'s what HD means. How nice it looks is totally a different question. And frankly, it is very subjective. I saw the Poor Sisters HD raw too, and I thought that wasn\'t any better looking than Haruhi, even with the added details at parts and less artifacts and blurring. Nothing I read about Haruhi\’s broadcast said HD, so I would presume it wasn\’t either. I think you have to say that EVERY single 1280×720+ raw is HD because that\’s what HD means. How nice it looks is totally a different question. And frankly, it is very subjective. I saw the Poor Sisters HD raw too, and I thought that wasn\’t any better looking than Haruhi, even with the added details at parts and less artifacts and blurring.

]]>